Legal Opinion

Murray v. Catlett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1853Published

Appeal from Muscatine District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion l>y

Greene, J.

Proceedings commenced under *109the Code, by H. Murray, to foreclose a mortgage against defendants. The mortgage was executed by Malcolm Murray to secure the payment of notes jointly and severally made by said M. and H. Murray ; the latter having signed only as security. The amount last due was paid by Henry, who thereupon took an assignment of the mortgage and note in consideration of the payment, and M. Murray conveyed his equity of redemption to defendants. Defendants demurred to the petition:

1. Because M. Murray and wife were not made parties.

2. Because the mortgage was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lidderdale's Executors v. of RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Miller v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1843
  3. Swift v. EdsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
  4. Atwood v. VincentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
  5. Shaw v. HoadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API