Legal Opinion

Crusader Entertainment, LLC v. Cussler

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard F. Braun, J.

Defendants move, pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130, for an order granting sanctions against plaintiff and its attorneys for frivolous conduct. The motion was denied because movants have failed to demonstrate any frivolous conduct on the part of plaintiff or its attorneys.

This action arises in connection with an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, Cussler v Crusader Entertainment, which involved the development of a motion picture entitled “Sahara” that was based on a book by defendant Clive Cussler (Cussler). On May…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buechel v. BainNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Azzopardi v. American Blower Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re the Estate of LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Tavella v. TavellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Kremen v. Benedict P. Morelli & Associates, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API