Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Heller

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 1, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rubenstein, S.

Motion to preclude is granted unless within five days after the service of a copy of the order to be entered herein, claimant serves a new bill of particulars verified by him and in compliance with the demand, with the exception that the names of witnesses need not be furnished. In furnishing the particulars requested, the bill should follow the designation of the items set forth in the demand (Roden v. Bond Stores, 80 N. Y. S. 2d 88).

In a claim for services allegedly rendered to a decedent, and as here, also to decedent’s predeceased wife, during their respective illnesses,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCready v. Island Park-Long Beach, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Fisher v. BloombergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. In re the Estate of LearyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  4. Barthelmues v. IvesNew Rochelle City Court · 1948
  5. Goakes v. City of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coonradt v. WalcoNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Aker v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API