Legal Opinion

Gulf Insurance v. Holland Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1951No. 4-9383PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul Ward, J.

In tlie lower court appellee, Holland Construction Company, was the plaintiff and brought suit to recover on an insurance policy to compensate it for damages caused to a ditching machine. The Gulf Insurance Company, the insurer, and the appellant here, defended principally on three grounds: First, that the policy provided that notice of any damage must be given immediately; second, that the policy provided the assured shall within sixty days after the damage make a written statement showing among other things the value of each article damaged; and third, that the policy provided that the suit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Franklin Life Insurance v. GalliganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Home Life & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Franklin Life Insurance v. MorrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  5. The Security Insurance Company v. Van NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Sun Insurance Office, Limited v. ClaySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Simmons Foods, Inc. v. Industrial Risk InsurersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. Chandler Trailer Co v. Lawyer's Surety Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API