Goldstein v. Trustees of Sailors' Snug Harbor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentVaet Voorhis, J.
The basic question presented by this submission is whether the testator intended that there should continue to be eight trustees to administer the charitable trust created by his will, of representative standing in the community, or whether the number was meant to be reduced progressively, in course of time, as the particular positions became abolished which were mentioned in the will as designating the persons to act as trustees. The law appears to be correctly stated in comment b of section 108 of the Restatement of the Law of Trusts, that “ If the settlor names several persons as trustees…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colson v. PelgramNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- City of Boston v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Erie Railroad Co. v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- In re LeavittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- In re DietzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.