Legal Opinion

Sewickley Water Works v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1902 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Public Utility Commission (PUC) determined that the Sewickley Water Works is a municipal corporation rendering extraterritorial service and is thereby subject to the PUC’s jurisdiction. The Water Works challenges the PUC’s conclusion that it is an agent that is owned and maintained by the Borough of Sewickley whose geographic boundaries are co-extensive with the Borough’s.

The Water Works was created by a special act of the General Assembly, Act of February 21, 1873, P.L. 147 (Water Works Act) for the purpose of “erecting and maintaining waterworks to supply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Akron Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. White Oak Borough Authority AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Akron v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gall v. Allegheny County Health DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Ass'n of Community Organizations v. GuarinoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. In Re: Condemnation of Premises Owned by R.E. Powell, II ~ Appeal of R.E. Powell, IICommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API