Konecny v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction for arson and other crimes, Mario Konecny argues that the trial court erred in its handling of the jury and that the evidence was insufficient as to the charges of arson and possession of a firearm during the commission of an aggravated assault. We find no error and affirm.
“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.” Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 (607 SE2d 165) (2004). We neither weigh the evidence nor judge the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Vega v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Milam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Whisnant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chance v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012