Legal Opinion
Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtByrne, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $2,634, with interest, being the amount of judgment recovered by the plaintiff on February 17, 1928, against one Sol Pion for the loss of services resulting from injury to his wife, Bessie Brustein, who was struck by an automobile belonging to the said Sol Pion. Execution was duly issued on said judgment and was returned “ Unsatisfied ” by reason of the insolvency of said Sol Pion.
Bessie Brustein has also recovered a judgment against Pion for personal injuries in the sum of $8,145. Defendant has paid $5,000 and costs upon this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. SmartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- New York Life Insurance v. HardisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- German Alliance Insurance v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hopkins v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clarke v. Harleysville Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941