Legal Opinion

Fay Anderson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1977No. 76-1325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Fay Anderson and members of his family seek redress under the Federal Tort Claims Act for invasion of privacy, wiretapping, and damage to business and reputation allegedly resulting from negligent design and implementation of the Internal Revenue Service’s Tax Preparer’s Program. The district court for the Northern District of Iowa (McManus, C. J.) dismissed the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a), the so-called discretionary acts exception to the FTCA, and 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h), which bars claims under the FTCA for, among other things, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Sam B. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Cruikshank v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977
  3. Gross v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1981
  4. Providence State Bank v. BohannonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. Providence State Bank v. Donald R. Bohannon, Providence State Bank v. Donald R. Bohannon, Joel A. Montgomery, Helen M. Johnson, and C. E. Montgomery, Trustees of the Montgomery TrustsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API