People v. Cooke
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The trial court’s failure to make a finding of necessity for the stun belt’s use does not constitute an unwaivable mode of proceedings error (see People v Buchanan, 13 NY3d 1, 4 [2009]; see generally People v Hanley, 20 NY3d 601, 604 [2013]; People v Schrock, 108 AD3d 1221, 1224-1225 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 998 [2013], denied reconsideration 23 NY3d 1025 [2014]; see also People v Gamble, 18 NY3d 386, 396-397 [2012], rearg denied 19 NY3d 833 [2012]). Thus, as defendant never objected, and indeed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. GambleNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. HanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. Daniel A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. PressleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- The People v. Perry C. GriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.