Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Edmund

Licking Circuit Court

Decided March 15, 1901Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Licking county.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglass, J.

Harland H. Edmund brought his action in the court below .■against Edward A.Storer, Joseph Rogers,and Frank Rutherford, to recover from them the sum of two hundred and fifteen ■dollars. This sum, he alleges, was won from the plaintiff •at gaming, and by him paid to defendants, which they now hold to his use. That, by reason thereof, an action has accrued to him under the statute against gaming; for which •sum,and interest, together with a sum not greater than $500, as exemplary damages, he claims judgment against all these parties. He alleges that Storer, and Rogers & Rutherford were partners,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelley v. HighfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Austin & Taylor v. Williams, Chase, & GardenerOhio Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Palmer v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API