Legal Opinion
Dugan v. Missouri Neon & Plastic Advertising Company
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided November 11, 1971No. Civ. A. 2710PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES
COLLINSON, District Judge.
This is an interpleader action. Plaintiff has deposited the sum of $6274.03 into the registry of the Court, and has named the three adverse claimants to this sum as defendants. Presently pending are motions for summary judgment filed by Tubelite Company, Inc. [hereinafter “Tubelite”] and the United States. The third named defendant, Missouri Neon and Plastic Advertising Company, has not filed an answer in this action.
The facts are not in dispute. In May, 1970, Tubelite filed an action against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marx v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Beeghly v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1957
- Chenoweth v. La MasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Rabiste v. SouthernSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Jacques v. GogginSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoffman Chevrolet, Inc. v. Washington County National Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Dugan v. Missouri Neon & Plastic Advertising Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Hoffman Chev. v. Wash. Co. Nat'l Sav.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- M. R. Dugan, D/B/A M. R. Dugan Auction Company v. Missouri Neon & Plastic Advertising Company and Tubelite Company, Inc. v. United States of America, All-Temp, Inc., a Corporation v. Lloyd Williams, D/B/A Williams Heating and Plumbing Company v. Ralph E. Boyer, Contractor, Inc., a Corporation, Garnishee-Plaintiff v. Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury of the United States of America, and Lloyd WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- J. H. Jewelry Co. v. V. I. Jewelry & Repairs, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1981