Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. International Harvester Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 20, 1955No. Civ. No. 31309PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This action was commenced under Section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, 46 U.S.C.A. §. 688, the Jones Act, to recover damages for injury to the complainant allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendant and the unseaworthiness of its vessel.

Defendant moves the court for judgment on the pleadings.

It appearing that the same issues were formerly raised between the same parties in Civil No. 53 C 297 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and that on stipulation of the parties, in which plaintiff’s attorney…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Kawai Farms, Inc. v. LongstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MaishCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. Edleman v. McMullin Orchards (In Re Silver Mill Frozen Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
  5. LaFollette v. HerronDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API