Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Poppell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 7, 1987No. BM-362Published

1ConcurrenceNimmons, Judge

specially concurring,

After the Supreme Court’s opinion in Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986), it appears that the only sphere of applicability of the habitual offender law is in those relatively rare situations where the sentencing guidelines scoresheet calls for a sentence in excess of the offense’s statutory maximum. See Winters v. State, 500 So.2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). That situation does not exist in the instant case.

Ordinarily, I would not feel that a defendant should be permitted on direct appeal to make the kind of attack…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Myers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Winters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API