Tinsley v. State

Defendant-appellant Richard Tinsley (Tinsley) was convicted of entering with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: theft, following a trial to the court.1 His motion to correct errors was overruled, and this appeal was perfected.

On appeal, Tinsley first questions the sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial to support his conviction. When questions regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction are raised on appeal, this court will only consider the evidence most favorable to appellee-State together with all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. We will neither…