Legal Opinion

N.Y.C. Medical & Neurodiagnostic, P.C. v. Republic Western Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 12, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles J. Markey, J.

The principal issue in defendant Republic Western Insurance Company’s motion to reargue — incorrectly labeled a motion to renew — is the propriety of this court, in its prior decision of July 7, 2003 (reported electronically at 2003 NY Slip Op 51070[U] [2003]), in employing information made available on a state governmental Web site and examining and using admissions, statements made by both Republic and its sibling corporation, U-Haul, on their Internet Web sites. This motion to reargue appears to be the first in the nation to challenge a court’s use…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLPSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

NYC Medical & Neurodiagnostic, P.C. v. Republic Western InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004