Legal Opinion

SCHLAMPP v. McMahon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 19, 2010No. A10A1266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Senior Appellate Judge.

Robert Schlampp, D. C., appeals from the dismissal of his claims against Kevin McMahon, D. C., asserting that the trial court erred in holding: (1) that the statutorily prescribed 180-day time period for substituting a party after death is suggested on the record begins to run from the time the suggestion of death is filed, rather than from the time it is served on the executor of the deceased party’s estate; and (2) that Schlampp’s motion to substitute the executrix of Dr. McMahon’s estate was therefore untimely. We agree and therefore reverse the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. SOUTHEASTERN CAPITAL CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Dubberly v. NailCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Anderson v. SOUTHEASTERN CAPITAL CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Bledsoe v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Northside Corp. v. MosbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diamond Woodruff v. Terrance JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  2. WESLEY ERIC TEMPLES v. MILTON HITSONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API