Legal Opinion
Holsberg v. Shankman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in permitting plaintiff to relocate to the Washington, D.C., area with the three children of the parties’ marriage. The custodial parent’s desire to start a new life in a distant location for her own personal happiness does not constitute an exceptional circumstance or pressing concern warranting relocation of the children (see, Cooper-Jones v Williams, 162 AD2d 1001; Stec v Levindofske, 153 AD2d 310, Iv denied 75 NY2d 711; Matter of Ellor v Ellor, 145 AD2d 773). The noncustodial parent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ellor v. EllorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Stec v. LevindofskeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Cooper-Jones v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radford v. PropperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Pascarelli v. PascarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Schultz v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.