Legal Opinion

Guillermo Baez Espinosa v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 24, 1996No. 8900-94Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

107 T.C. No. 9

UNITED STATES TAX COURT GUILLERMO BAEZ ESPINOSA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 8900-94. Filed September 24, 1996. P, a nonresident alien individual, failed to file Federal income tax returns for the years 1987 through 1991. R repeatedly notified P of his failure to file. R prepared substitute returns for P and notified P that pursuant to sec. 874(a), I.R.C., no deductions were allowable. P subsequently submitted returns claiming the benefit of deductions. R then issued a notice of deficiency. Held: P is not entitled to the benefit of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mailman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  2. Brittingham v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. Blenheim Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  4. Taylor Secur., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
  5. Ardbern Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API