Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Curry

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 10, 2014No. 2120712Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing

2Per curiam

On rehearing, Bonnie A. Curry and Bennie R. Walker argue that this court failed to consider their attempt to amend their “counterclaim” to add MacArthur Mike Hawkins (“MacArthur”) as a counterclaim defendant under Rule 13(h), Ala. R. Civ. P., and Rule 20(a), Ala. R. Civ. P., which, they argue, authorize the addition of parties not already involved in an action to a counterclaim asserted against an opposing party. See Century 21 Paramount Real Estate, Inc. v. Hometown Realty, LLC, 34 So.3d 658 (Ala.2009).

As we explained in our opinion on original submission:

“On…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lunderberg v. BiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Maness v. ALABAMA FARM BUREAU, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Woodall v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Gobble v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API