State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Curry
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion
On Application for Rehearing
2Per curiam
On rehearing, Bonnie A. Curry and Bennie R. Walker argue that this court failed to consider their attempt to amend their “counterclaim” to add MacArthur Mike Hawkins (“MacArthur”) as a counterclaim defendant under Rule 13(h), Ala. R. Civ. P., and Rule 20(a), Ala. R. Civ. P., which, they argue, authorize the addition of parties not already involved in an action to a counterclaim asserted against an opposing party. See Century 21 Paramount Real Estate, Inc. v. Hometown Realty, LLC, 34 So.3d 658 (Ala.2009).
As we explained in our opinion on original submission:
“On…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Lunderberg v. BiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Maness v. ALABAMA FARM BUREAU, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Woodall v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Gobble v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.