Legal Opinion

Brummett v. Brummett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 29, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MILLIKEN, Judge.

The appellants, who were defendants below, assert that four probated holographic instruments which were executed over a period of a year should be read together as the last will and testament of Sarah Sutton Wyrick, who died on the 30th day of December, 1954, at the age of 87, leaving an estate of approximately $20,000. The instruments are listed in their chronological order and not in the order of their probate as follows:

Instrument No. 1. This instrument was probated January 7, 1955.

“Corbin, Ky.
“June 10th, 1953.
“I Sarah Sutton Wyrick being of sound mind & memory do will &…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winn v. WilliamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Kasey v. Fidelity Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Graham v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Ward v. PutnamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  5. Daniel v. Tyler's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John R. Todd, IV v. Hilliard Lyons Trust Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API