City of Austin v. Whittington
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.
In this case, we are being asked to address a district court’s declaratory judgment interpreting the judgment of a county court that has been reversed and remanded for completion of trial. The City of Austin (the “City”) attempted to condemn property owned by Harry Whitting-ton and the other individuals listed in the style of this case (the “Whittingtons”). A condemnation proceeding was conducted in a county court at law, and the City obtained title to the property listed in its resolution. That judgment was later reversed on appeal. Prior to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Patterson v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Waco Independent School District v. GibsonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Perry v. Del RioTexas Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Austin v. Harry M. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Austin v. WhittingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Texas Municipal Power Agency v. Kirk A. Johnston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Whittington v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- High Mountain Ranch Group, LLC v. Elbert L. Niece, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.