Legal Opinion

Alise Cooks v. Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided January 6, 2026No. 4:25-cv-04106Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION ALISE COOKS, 4:25-CV-04106-ECS Plaintiff, VS. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS NATURAL GROCERS BY VITAMIN □ COTTAGE, INC., Defendant. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) reflects a national policy favoring arbitration. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339, 34546 (2011). “The principal purpose of the FAA is to ensure that private arbitration agreements are enforced according to their terms.” Id. at 344 (quoting Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Johnson v. John Deere Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Charles S. Barker Express Golf, Inc. v. Golf U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API