Legal Opinion

Boles v. McCarty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

*ERROR to the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Debt. The declaration is upon a bond in the penalty of $500 with a condition in which, after reciting that, on, &c., a license had been granted to the defend*459ant to retail spirituous liquors in the town of Huntington, &c., it was stipulated “that should the said MeCarty not permit any gambling, rioting, or disorderly conduct in his house, but conform to the laws of the State restraining gambling, rioting, and disorderly conduct in his house, and should he not suffer any unlawful assemblies, or sell or retail any spirituous liquors on the Sabbath day except to travelers, then said writing was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Redpath v. NottinghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buckner's Adm'r v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API