Legal Opinion

Burnell v. Robertson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1848PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Replevin,, in the Marshall Circuit Court, brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error, and heard before the Hon. John D. Catón and a jury at the March term, 1848, when a verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant. The particular instruction to the jury excepted to, is recited in the Opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Trumbull, J.

This was an action of replevin, in which the question involved was the title to the property replevied, consisting of a number of stage horses, their harness, &c. O. Hinton & Co., mail contractors, were the former owners of the property, and on the 10th day of February, 1847, at St. Louis, conveyed it and a large quantity of other property upon different stage routes in Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin to the plaintiffs as creditors, who, immediately after the execution of the bill of sale, proceeded as fast as practicable to take possession of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rice v. AustinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  2. Whitney v. LyndeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutcheson v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Jacobson v. PattersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  3. Wilson v. WalrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API