Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Alan Steady v. Richard Kern

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2012No. 49A02-1201-CT-34PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Chief Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

A jury found Alan Steady one-hundred percent at fault for injuries Ronald Kern sustained when the two were involved in a car accident, and a $98,000 judgment was entered against Steady to compensate Kern for his injuries. Because Steady was only insured up to $25,000, State Farm, Kern’s insurer, paid Kern underinsured motorist benefits. Steady requested that the trial court deem the judgment against him satisfied because Kern was compensated by State Farm, and the trial court granted Steady’s motion. State Farm appeals, raising one issue for our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State, Indiana Civil Rights Com'n v. INIIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Peele v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Tacco Falcon Point, Inc. v. Atlantic Ltd. Partnership XIIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hairston v. HarwardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Llewellyn v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
  3. Michael Brown v. Timothy L. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API