Legal Opinion

Halford v. . Senter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Bond,, J., at tbe May Term, 1915, of HAENETT. Mandamus to compel defendants to audit and pay tbe plaintiff $600, salary as superintendent of bealtb for Harnett County for one year. Upon tbe return of tbe writ it was made absolute, and defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.

Tbe agreed facts are tbat plaintiff was duly elected superintendent of bealtb for Harnett County by tbe board of bealtb of said county and his compensation fixed by said board at tbe rate of $600 per annum. Upon tbe presentation of plaintiff’s claim, tbe matter being properly brought before tbe defendants, tbe board of commissioners of said county, they declined to audit and allow such expenditure, upon tbe ground tbat it was exorbitant and unreasonable.

Tbe defendants then authorized an expenditure of $300 per annum for tbe services of plaintiff as superintendent of bealtb.

Section 9 of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCullers v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. O'Neal v. JennetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Champion v. Vance County Board of HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Wilson v. . HoldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Simmons v. . McCullinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API