Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 2012No. B233204PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

On appeal, defendant Kevin Jermaine Jones, who was convicted of making a criminal threat (Pen. Code, § 422),1 grand theft from a person (§ 487), and simple assault (§ 240), contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in admitting hearsay statements under the forfeiture by wrongdoing doctrine. In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that under the forfeiture by wrongdoing doctrine, the trial court properly admitted a statement by a witness who was dissuaded from appearing at trial by defendant. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. People v. GilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Kerley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. State v. MaestasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  3. (HC) Fowler v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Brown, Frederick L.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021
  5. People v. MerchantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API