Marshall v. Dunlap
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The sole question posed is whether the court below abused its discretion in ordering a change of place of trial on the ground of convenience of witnesses and the promotion of the ends of justice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 397, subd. 3.)
Appellants Marshall sued respondents in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County for the wrongful death of their parents. The amended complaint alleges that the deaths resulted from a collision of the Marshall automobile with a jeep of the Dunlaps negligently driven by one Spivey, agent of the Dunlaps, and that the accident occurred about 11 miles south of Indio in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Willingham v. PecoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.