McCready v. Hoffius

I agree with the Court of Appeals and with the dissenting opinion of Justice Boyle.

I write separately to add that the majority misconstrues People v Davis, 294 Mich 499; 293 NW 734 (1940), and People v June, 294 Mich 681; 293 NW 906 (1940), claiming that those cases held “that the lewd and lascivious nature of the relationships had not been shown, although the prosecutor had provided proof that the men were cohabitating with each other’s wives.” Ante, p 141. The majority implies that those cases held that some conduct beyond cohabitat-ing while sharing sexual relations is necessary evidence…