Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentWilson, Circuit Judge
The Constitution and common sense usually dictate the same result. This case is no exception. An important constitution*914al right is at stake, and Alabama can easily honor that right; all Alabama needs to do is afford Thomas Arthur access to a telephone. Both the Constitution and common sense say Alabama should do just that,
Arthur asked Alabama if one of his designated execution witnesses, his attorney, could have access to a telephone during his execution. Alabama could have easily granted this request. Affording the attorney-witness access to a telephone, such as an already existing landline,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.