Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Members of Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 12, 2010No. SC 90113PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Arbary Jackson began serving a prison sentence in 1977. He was released on parole in 2001. Some years after being released on parole, Jackson was required to pay a fee authorized in 2005 by section 217.690, RSMo Supp. 2008. 1 Although the fee did not apply to the time Jackson already had spent on parole, he argues that applying the law to him for future services provided violates Mo. Const, art. I, sec. 13 as a law retrospective in its operation. The trial court correctly determined there was no violation.

“A statute is not retrospective or retroactive because it relates to prior facts or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jerry-Russell Bliss, Inc. v. Hazardous Waste Management CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. Hensley v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. In re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
  3. Little v. McSwainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Harden v. Missouri Board of Probation and ParoleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Thornton v. Missouri Board of Probation & ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API