Ex parte Larrucea
District Court, S.D. California
Application of Victor Larrucea and three others for writs of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
BLEDSOE, District Judge.
Pursuant to petitions filed, an order to show cause why writs of habeas corpus should not issue was entered; Upon the hearing it developed that the above-named petitioner, with three of his countrymen, are citizens of the kingdom of Spain; for some years they have been-domiciled within the United States, and each of them has heretofore filed his declaration of intention to become a citizen of the United States under the naturalization laws thereof; they were arrested off the shore of Mexico by a United States war vessel, and are now detained under appropriate process…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Whitney v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The Cherokee TobaccoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Rumsa. Rumsa v. HersheyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- United States v. LamotheCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States ex rel. Pfefer v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1918
- United States v. GredzensDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
- In re TrachselDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.