Legal Opinion

Mollica v. Chilean Line

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 9, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

The defendant- has moved for judgment notwithstanding a verdict for the plaintiff, in a suit by a longshoreman for personal injuries sustained while working aboard defendant’s vessel. Plaintiff was an employee of an independently contracted stevedore, engaged to load cargo into the holds of the Chilean Line steamship'. The loading operation had commenced at 8:00 a. m. of August IS, 1949, the day of the accident, -and the first gang continued to work until 6:00 p. m. or 6:15 p. m. A second shift started work at 7:00 p. m., and the -accident causing injury to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guerrini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Bruszewski v. Isthmian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Grasso v. LorentzenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. Lauro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Lynch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dixon v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Mollica v. Compania Sud-Americana De Vapores (Chilean Line)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API