Brugman v. Charlson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Action for specific performance. From a decree entered tberefor in District Court, Ward County, Leighton> J., defendants appeal.
1ConcurrenceBirdzerl, J.
I concur in the result and in the reasons assigned therefor, hut I see no occasion for any discussion relative to the proper authorization to fill the blanks in a deed. What would constitute a proper authorization is, of course, not involved in this ca.se, and what is said on that subject is obviously a mere dictum.
*118Bronson, J.
(addendum) In the opinion of the court herein the following principle of' law is stated: “On its face, the deed delivered to the plaintiff with the name of the grantee therein blank with no proper authorization shown to fill in the name of the grantee was void and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Drury v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- White v. Vermont & Massachusetts RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Lafferty v. LaffertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Board of Education v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Inhabitants of South Berwick v. HuntressSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1865
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.