Legal Opinion

Balish v. Farnham

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1976No. 8009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

First American Title Company of Nevada commenced this action to require the defendants, Jessie Farnham and Elverda Farnham Balish, to interplead their claims to the sum of $30,000 held by the title company as the result of a ranch sale. After the defendants had appeared in the action the title company was allowed to deposit the money with the court and withdraw from the litigation. The matter proceeded to trial with the interpled defendants as the litigating parties.

Elverda claimed the fund by reason of an assignment thereof from her father, E. D. Farnham.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Davidson v. StreeterNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bowler v. CurlerNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Rutherford v. Union Land & Cattle Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rockwell v. Carroll Printing & Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guild, Hagen & Clark, Ltd. v. First National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bank Of New York Mellon v. Highland Ranch Homeowners AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  4. GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC VS. TJ ALLEN, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2016
  5. GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC VS. TJ ALLEN, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API