Legal Opinion

Dobbins v. Higgins

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John A. Jameson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

We perceive no error in refusing a continuance by the court below. It was stipulated by the parties that plaintiff might introduce any evidence that would be admissible under any special count that could be drawn on the contract, and defendants might introduce any evidence that would be admissible under well drawn special pleas to the action. Suppose that there had been a special count, claiming extra pay on account of hard-pan excavation, would it not have apprised defendants of such a claim as fully as adding a charge for that item ; and defendants had stipulated as to the introduction of…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. J. C. Lysle Milling Co. v. North Alabama Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Porter v. the Arrow Head Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Dyer v. Middle Kittitas Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API