Legal Opinion
United States v. Pappagoda
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 23, 1923No. 2552PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
The accused has been indicted by the grand jury and is charged in two counts with violating sections 2 and 8, pp. 785, 786, 789, of 38 Stat. at Large (Comp. St. §§ 6287h, 6287n), which is commonly known as the Harrison Act. The first count *215charges possession of a certain quantity of opium, morphine, and cocaine, and the second count charges a sale to one Joseph Gaines of New Haven.
To this indictment the accused has filed a plea in abatement and a motion to quash the indictment, in which he alleges as follows r
“(1) That during the hearing before the grand jury, while it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Woo Wai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Goode v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. LindenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- State v. DolceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.