Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Bruce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1886PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Mecosta. '(Judkins, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

At the general election in the year 1882, the plaintiff was a candidate for congress.

The defendant was then editor and publisher of the Big Rapids Current, a newspaper published in the city of Big Kapids, in the county of Mecosta, and circulated in that and other counties in the congressional district which was sought to be represented in congress by the plaintiff, as well as in other counties of the State outside of said district.

The defendant, through the columns of his newspaper, opposed the election of the plaintiff to the office for which he was a candidate, and supported the election of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. RootCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  2. Root v. King & VerplanckNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  3. Rearick v. WilcoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Aldrich v. Press Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
  5. Conrad v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Park v. Detroit Free Press Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State ex inf. Crow v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Post Pub. Co. v. HallamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  4. Morse v. Times-Republican Printing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Upton v. HumeOregon Supreme Court · 1893

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API