Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 11, 1907No. 3763PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted under an indictment charging him as an accomplice to the burglary of the depot of the Orient Railway Company at the little village of Carney. Two errors are urged: First, the insufficiency of the evidence; second, the misconduct of the jury. Appellant was not charged as a principal but as an accomplice, advising, etc., those who should have burglarized the depot. The theory of the State, which is supported by the evidence, is that the burglary was committed for the purpose of stealing whisky which had been shipped in over the railroad by the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Langford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Lamb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API