Legal Opinion

Hart v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 5, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE CoiJBT BY

DrURY, COMMISSIONER

Affirming.

Walter Hart, having' been adjudged not entitled to hold the office of subdistrict trustee in Hart school sub-district No. 71 in Knox county, has appealed.

More than 15 days before July 14, 1934, Walter Hart filed with the superintendent of schools of Knox county a written notice of his intention to become a candidate for this office. The appellee, B. C. Rose, filed a timely and similar notice, and pursuant to section 4399-8, Ky. Stats. Supp. 1934, the names of these two men were printed on the official ballots used at the election held on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scholl v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Francis v. SturgillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. McKinney v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Hardin v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Whitney v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burton v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Brandenberg v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. Fletcher v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
  4. Huff v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Woods v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API