Legal Opinion

Andrulonis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 30, 1991No. Nos. 61, 62 and 506; Dockets 89-6274, 90-6016 and 90-6028PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

The Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 39, 116 L.Ed.2d 18, has remanded this case to us for further consideration of the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-2680, (“FTCA”), in light of its opinion in United States v. Gaubert, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1267, 113 L.Ed.2d 335 (1991). After considering additional briefs submitted by the parties, we conclude for the reasons that follow that Gaubert does not undermine our original opinion, which is reported as Andrulonis v. United States, 924 F.2d 1210 (2d Cir.1991).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Andrulonis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. LW v. McComb Separate Mun. School Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Shansky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. C.R.S. ex rel. D.B.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Andrulonis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. SweetDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API