Jackson v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. The plaintiff in error, having conceded in his brief that he was not entitled to recover in ejectment, no longer complains as to this aspect of the case and, for this reason, this court' will not concern itself with count one of the petition. Hill v. Merritt, 146 Ga. 307 (91 S. E. 204); Ward v. Speer, 153 Ga. 29 (111 S. E. 411); Trustees, Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. Nisbet, 191 Ga. 821 (14 S. E. 2d, 64); Barnes v. Bell, 206 Ga. 660 (58 S. E. 2d, 400).
2. The evidence showing that there were other heirs who would be necessary parties to partitioning, but who…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Hill v. MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Wright v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Hill v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Barnes v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seymour v. PresleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Poole v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964