Legal Opinion

State v. Lietzau

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 22, 1995No. Nos. 94-1629, 94-1650 and 94-2072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellee concedes that the trial judge erred in entering “downward departure” sentences in three felony prosecutions without reasons therefore. Herrin v. State, 568 So.2d 920 (Fla.1990); Barbera v. State, 505 So.2d 413 (Fla.1987), receded on other grounds, Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990); State v. Fields, 602 So.2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). We therefore reverse the sentences under review, vacate appellant’s pleas which were entered in exchange for the reduced sentences and return this matter to the trial court for further proceedings on the original informations.

Reversed and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Barbera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Herrin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. State v. FieldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sklar v. BrawleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. State v. EverettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API