Legal Opinion
Novak & Rehner, Inc. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 16, 1948No. Claim No. 28289Published
1Opinion of the CourtGormaN, J.
The claimant, formerly known as R. F. Frye & Co., entered into a contract with the State of New York to furnish labor and materials for heating work and service connections at the State Institute of Agriculture on Long Island, Farmingdale, New York.
Two causes of action are alleged in the claim, the first being for the balance admittedly due upon the completion of the contract, and the second being for extra w<?rk which claimant alleges was performed over and above the contract requirements .at the State’s direction.
*67A motion for severance of the two causes of action was made and granted, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Hoffman v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Borough Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.