Legal Opinion
Rose v. Fretz
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided December 2, 1899No. 52PublishedCited by 3 opinions
This was a suit in equity for the infringement of a patent. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
This suit is for infringement of the first and second claims of letters patent Ho. 504,944, granted to John Rose, which are:
“(1) A tubular metal stick for umbrellas or parasols, said stick being drawn down near one end, so that the tubular end portion of the stick is reduced in diameter and increased in thickness, as compared with the body of the stick, substantially as specified. (2) The combination of the tubular metal stick drawn down near one end, so that the tubular end portion of the stick is of less diameter than the body, with the notch applied to said reduced…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adams v. Tannage Patent Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1897
- Rose v. HirshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lektophone Corp. v. Miller Bros.District Court, D. Delaware · 1930
- Flat Slabs Patents Co. v. Wright, Barrett & Stilwell Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1920
- Kahn v. W. A. Gaines & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908