Legal Opinion

Hallyburton v. Slagle.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 11, 1903PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Petition to rehear this case, reported in 130 N. C., 482.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is a petition to' rehear the above entitled case, which was decided at' the February Term, 1902, and is reported in 130 N. C., 482.

The assignment of error in regard to the defendant’s claim for an estate by the curtesy in tract No. 2, known as the Chunn land, cannot be sustained. As the parties were married before 1868 and the land was acquired in 1877, the defendant was entitled to an estate by the curtesy, at the death of his wife, provided she had died intestate or had not disposed of the property by her will to some one else. Tiddy v. Graves, 126 N. C., 620. It appears in this case…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Smith v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Reynolds v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  4. Tiddy v. . GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. O'Kelly v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wool v. Fleetwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Bryan v. . EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Buchanan v. Harrington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Beaufort Lumber Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Murray v. NewsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API