Legal Opinion

Dyke v. Dyke

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 12, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 2186PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This is an action for recovery of death benefits of a National Service Life Insurance contract between the United States and Harold Dyke, now deceased. Viola Dyke was originally the designated principal beneficiary. Willie Mae Keaton Dyke is the substituted principal beneficiary, Betty Sue Dyke, daughter of the insured, being the substituted contingent beneficiary. The action was commenced against Willie Mae Keaton Dyke and the United States of America. The Government has assumed the role of stakeholder and impleaded the child, Betty Sue Dyke.

Plaintiff seeks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodward v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  2. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  3. Pack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Barton v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. Murray v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heifner v. SoderstromDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  2. Dyke v. DykeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  3. Wolfe v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  4. Frakes v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964
  5. Dyke v. DykeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API