Legal Opinion

Lake George Associates v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2006No. Claim 104481PublishedCited by 3 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ClPARICK, J.

We are asked to determine whether the State, in its appropriation of claimant’s and its neighbors’ land for the purpose of improving an abutting highway and reestablishing access pursuant to Highway Law § 10 (24-d), deprived claimant of a legal right of access to the public roads. We hold that the appropriation of land, under these circumstances, creates a legal, enforceable right of access to the driveways and turning lanes on the neighboring properties and to the public road, and thus that consequential damages are not warranted.

Lake George Associates…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Priestly v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Wolfe v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Pollak v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Kravec v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker Development Corp. v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Gilbert v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2009
  3. Matter of Town of Ramapo (Weis)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API