Legal Opinion

Scott v. Dodson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1948No. 4-8599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

G-bifjbtN Smith, Chief Justice.

We are asked to say that a writing, executed in testamentary manner and with appropriate formality, was not the will of Mrs. Rita G. Boykin. This would contradict a Probate Court judgment that mental capacity was not lacking when the document was executed.

Appellants — Mrs. Boykin’s first cousins by the whole blood — insist it was unnatural for the testatrix to go beyond that line of relationship and favor second cousins by the half blood, and they point to irrational acts and demeanor extending over a long period, and to the fact that between 1892 and 1894 she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. McClintockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Puryear v. PuryearSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Tobin v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
  4. Pernot v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hiler v. CudeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  3. Abel v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Thiel v. MobleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Green v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API